22 avril 2025
Economic Crime and Corporate Transparency Act (ECCTA) – 2 de 8 Publications
The Economic Crime and Corporate Transparency Act 2023 (ECCTA) introduces new compulsory identity verification (IDV) requirements for directors, persons with significant control (PSCs) and people filing information at Companies House.
Companies House estimates that this will affect more than 7 million people.
IDV requirements for directors and PSCs are expected to take effect in autumn 2025 (with a transition period for existing directors and PSCs). The requirement for those filing documents is expected to take effect from spring 2026.
Individuals can choose to have their identity verified in advance, if they wish. Early preparation is recommended. Individuals will usually only need to verify their identity once.
The IDV requirements will apply to all directors of UK companies.
Companies with an autumn confirmation statement date may wish to encourage their directors to verify their identity over the summer to avoid financial penalties for late filing of the confirmation statement. Individuals likely to be appointed to new directorships in the autumn (for example, on acquisitions) may also find advance IDV beneficial.
The IDV requirement is also expected to be extended to directors of overseas companies with a UK establishment registered at Companies House, although the timing of this is unclear.
An individual will be prohibited from acting as a director if their identity has not been verified (unless exempt). While breach does not affect the validity of their acts as a director, in practice the prohibition means that a director should not act on behalf of a company in their capacity as a director until their identity has been verified. The offence can attract an unlimited fine.
Companies will also have a duty to ensure that individuals do not act as directors unless their identity has been verified. Breach could lead to fines for the company and its directors.
Registrable PSCs will also need to have their identity verified. Registrable relevant legal entities (RLEs) will need to nominate a director as a 'relevant officer' who must have their identity verified.
Failure to comply will be an offence for the PSC or RLE, punishable with a fine. Companies do not have a duty to ensure a PSC or RLE complies, but may wish to inform them of the requirements as part of their shareholder engagement.
From spring 2026, individuals filing information at Companies House on behalf of a company will only be able to do so if they are an officer or employee of that particular company and have had their identity verified (unless they are an ACSP or employee of officer of an ACSP or an exception applies). It is hoped that legislative changes will be made to enable employees to file on behalf of other group companies, to avoid the administrative difficulties which the current framework is likely to cause.
In the meantime, groups should review their current filing practices and ascertain the impact of the restriction on the group companies' continued ability to file.
All LLP members will need to have their identity verified. The timing is expected to be similar to the requirements for companies.
On registration of a new LLP, proposed members will need to have their identity verified before the application for registration. Members of an existing LLP will need to have their identity verified before the LLP's next confirmation statement date.
Alongside new disclosure requirements for limited partnerships, which are due to take effect in spring 2026, a general partner which is a legal entity will need to specify an individual managing officer to act as its 'registered officer'. The registered officer must have their identify verified.
It is expected that this IDV requirement will take effect from spring 2026 and that existing LPs will have a 6 month transition period within which to comply.
There are two routes: (a) direct verification with Companies House; and (b) verification by a Companies House authorised agent, referred to as an 'authorised corporate service provider' (ACSP). ACSPs are intermediaries, such as Taylor Wessing, which are supervised by an anti-money laundering supervisory body and registered as an ACSP with Companies House.
The permitted identity documents slightly differ between the two routes. A biometric passport or UK photocard driving licence will usually be the easiest option, whether using an ACSP or the direct verification route.
The Companies House route offers three channels. Each permits slightly different documents to be provided as evidence of identity:
If using an ACSP, the list of permitted documents for the typical route is wider and includes:
There is also another route for ACSPs which has a much longer list, under which two documents must be provided.
Non-UK resident individuals who do not have a suitable biometric passport available for the One Login service, or are reluctant to use the UK governmental app, will need to use the services of an ACSP.
Whichever route is used, an email address must be provided which has not previously been used for IDV by anyone else. If you have multiple directorships, consider which would be the most appropriate email address to use.
Your name (and any former name), date of birth and residential home address (and previous home address if you have moved home in the last 12 months) must also be provided.
Additional documents may be needed if you have moved home in the last 12 months or changed your name.
As individuals should not act as a director until their identity has been verified, it is important to know when this has been completed. This will be particularly relevant, for example, in the case of director appointments and board meetings immediately following corporate transactions.
Where an individual verifies their identity directly with Companies House, they will be treated as having their identity verified from the date of the Companies House confirmation.
Where an individual has their identity verified by an ACSP, the ACSP will file a verification statement at Companies House and the individual will be treated as having their identity verified from the date on which the statement is filed.
Breach of the IDV requirements is an offence and can attract an unlimited fine.
If the lack of IDV delays filing a confirmation statement, a financial penalty for late filing may arise.
In addition, it is a criminal offence for any person to provide misleading, false or deceptive information to Companies House 'without reasonable excuse', which can attract an unlimited fine. There is also a new aggravated criminal offence for knowingly providing misleading, false or deceptive information, punishable with fines and potentially imprisonment. In the case of both offences, this would include any statement made in relation to IDV.
Get in touch with your usual Taylor Wessing contact for further information as to how we can help.
For further information on the impact of ECCTA on directors more widely, please see our article here.
22 April 2025
par Lorraine Smith
22 April 2025
par Debbie Cloake
29 October 2024
8 February 2024
par plusieurs auteurs
8 February 2024
par Emma Allen, Adeolu Faniran
27 November 2023
23 November 2023
27 October 2023
par Emma Allen
par Debbie Cloake
par Debbie Cloake et Lorraine Smith
par Debbie Cloake